Thanks to all who voted for Bill C-560 Equal Shared Parenting. Those who didn’t, RESIGN NOW!
IF YOU VOTED NO THEN YOU HAVE TO GO!
5/28/14 Doomsday.
The Day Canadian Families were doomed forever!
We very much appreciate the hard work that went into presenting the Equal Shared Parenting Amendment to the Divorce Act. We thank all those dedicated and hard working MPS who voted in favour of the Bill. Kudos to you for doing the right thing.
For twenty-two years and still ongoing, we have suffered the most heinous crimes against us by the incompetent judiciary and the Government of Canada for being a parent in Canada. We had extremely high hopes that this Private Members Bill, C-560, would pass and our torture would finally be over.
But no! It was not to be. 174/80 (with 49 abstaining) members voted against the most fair, reasonable and humane end to the torture of Canadian Families. Any reasonable person would have voted for Bill C-560. Abstaining means no.
Why?
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill,
voted along some hidden agenda party line.
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, voted in favour
of the continued abuse of families by the Canadian Bar Association for the purpose of profits. This unelected, and unaccountable organization preys on non custodial parents and their children to earn ever increasing profits until that family has been emotionally and financially wiped out forever.
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill,
did not consider the GUARANTEED CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS that is the constitution of Canada and Guarantees men and women are to be treated equally. Sect. 28. General
Sect. 28. Notwithstanding anything in this Charter, the rights and freedoms referred to in it are guaranteed equally to male and female persons.
-
?It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill,
disregarded Section 52 of the Charter which states: Section 52 – Constitution Act, 1982
The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
-
This section of the Constitution gives the courts the power to rule that a particular law is not valid if it violates the Charter, which is itself part of the Constitution. While section 52(1) is not part of the Charter, it provides courts with an important power to strike down laws that violate Charter rights. If only part of the law violates the Constitution, only that part will be ruled invalid.
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, intentionally intended to keep an unconstitutional law and unconstitutional implementation of that law established in Canada.
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, didn’t give a damn about the inhumane suffering of us and all the people, single, separated, living common law and divorced who are being denied their parental rights and their children’s rights, every day, by sole custody judges who do not adjudicate fairly or constitutionally. The US is way ahead of Canada.
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, do not consider non custodial parents as human beings deserving of raising their own children. You showed us that families don’t matter.
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, have doomed us all to hell!
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, have voted in favour of Apartheid, an odious third world order, rather than passing a Bill that would ensure the best interests of the child actually be enforced and not paid ignorant lip service that means nothing but profits.
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, have voted in favour of mothers’ exclusive rights to dominate fathers and to violate their children’ s rights to continue to be their fathers’ children and to share their lives with them.
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, have no regard for their own families who are most certainly victims of Divorce or separation at some time. There isn’t a person in Canada who is not affected by a divorce in the family.
-
?It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, have contributed to the National destruction of Canadian families and the violation of the Charter, again. Legal Rights
Sec. 7 Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of the person, and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
-
It is clear that the MPS who voted against the Bill, have violated the Equality Rights under the Charter. Equality before and under law and equal protection and benefit of law
Sect. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
-
Shame on you! You are unfit, incompetent and unconstitutional and you must resign. If you voted No, then you have to Go! Abstaining is a no vote.
Connie Brauer and Vic Harris
Parents who have been unlawfully deprived of their children.
Dad paid $1,000,000 to support this family. No rights! No kids!